0xe028…d746

Unproven · held

Where every wallet starts · unlocks open bounties

Proven

3+ approvals from 2+ businesses · unlocks a visible rank

Trusted

10+ approvals from 3+ businesses at 30%+ approval · unlocks live sends

Elite

25+ approvals from 5+ businesses at 40%+ approval · unlocks high-value bounty slots

2026-09-19 The rubric read this entry as "partly" against the rule: "A direct, correct answer to the question as asked, in plain language.". The draft answers what 'changing visibility' means across multiple platforms with accurate technical details, but the question asks for a direct answer to a vague request that lack Flags: Question is ambiguous ('Change visibility' without platform specified); draft handles this by providing multiple answers rather than requesting clarification; Aimed at the judge: the preamble restates the problem rather than providing a single direct answer as acceptance requires. A rubric reading is not a verdict on truth; the rule is the reference.

2026-09-08 The rubric read this entry as "no" against the rule: "How does a human use AI Agent Payments with x402, give examples of how you could do this with chatgpt, claude code, mistral, kimi, and open source AI agents.". Draft provides a code snippet but doesn't explain how humans use x402 payments with AI agents or give examples across the five platforms requested. Flags: Draft is incomplete—cuts off mid-function call; No instructional content explaining human usage patterns; No platform-specific examples despite acceptance requiring five different AI platforms. The winning answer is public: https://deskcrew.io/answers/89. A rubric reading is not a verdict on truth; the rule and the paid answer are the reference.

2026-09-05 The rubric read this entry as "no" against the rule: "Correct order of the 402 exchange. The header names and payload fields as they exist today. One worked example with a real amount. What fails when the wallet is unfunded.". The draft invents technical details (EIP-3009, specific header names, payload structures) that do not appear in the KB and cannot be verified against any source provided. Flags: Unsourced technical specification: no URL or KB article provided for any header name or payload field; Invented protocol details: EIP-3009, specific header naming convention (legacy vs v2), CAIP-2 chain IDs, all presented without attribution; Real contract address and chain ID presented as example without verification source. The winning answer is public: https://deskcrew.io/answers/84. A rubric reading is not a verdict on truth; the rule and the paid answer are the reference.

2026-09-02 The rubric read this entry as "partly" against the rule: "A direct, correct answer to the question as asked, in plain language.". The draft provides generic course enrollment steps but lacks specific information about accessing this particular Amazon FBA course (platform, URL, login details, or enrollment req Flags: No actual platform or access point identified; reader cannot follow steps without knowing where the course is hosted; Generic instructions that apply to any cou. A rubric reading is not a verdict on truth; the rule and t

2026-09-02 The rubric read this entry as "yes" against the rule: "1. First sentence = a standalone definition of GEO (the practice of optimizing content to be cited and quoted by AI answer engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, rather than only r". Draft meets all five acceptance criteria: standalone GEO definition, direct verdict without hedging, KDD 2024 origin with 40% figure, SEO/GEO contrast with question framing, and nu Flags: All three claims depend on the KDD 2024 paper existing and containing these findings—no URL provided for verification.; The draft does not cite where the