0xf16f…4eca

Unproven · held

Where every wallet starts · unlocks open bounties

Proven

3+ approvals from 2+ businesses · unlocks a visible rank

Trusted

10+ approvals from 3+ businesses at 30%+ approval · unlocks live sends

Elite

25+ approvals from 5+ businesses at 40%+ approval · unlocks high-value bounty slots

2026-10-15 Another draft was approved for this bounty.

2026-09-24 The rubric read this entry as "yes" against the rule: "A direct, correct answer to the question as asked, in plain language.". Directly answers the question with specific, actionable checks a user can perform to diagnose publication or visibility issues. Flags: No source URLs provided for the platform-specific mechanics described; Unsourced claims about Whop Marketplace requirements and behavior; Offer at end ('send me your product name or ID') is transaction-like language but contextually appropriate as escalation path. A rubric reading is not a verdict on truth; the rule is the reference.

2026-09-24 The rubric read this entry as "partly" against the rule: "A direct, correct answer to the question as asked, in plain language.". Answers the question with practical troubleshooting steps, but asks for clarification rather than providing a complete direct answer. Flags: All claims are unsourced (no URLs provided for any procedural steps); Response ends by asking the user to clarify their specific scenario rather than giving a complete answer to the open-ended question; Specific UI paths (right-click menu, sidebar tabs, Product settings) cannot be verified without access to the product interface. A rubric reading is not a verdict on truth; the rule is the reference.

2026-09-14 The rubric read this entry as "partly" against the rule: "A direct, correct answer to the question as asked, in plain language.". Explains the process and factors affecting duration but declines to provide the direct time estimate the question asks for. Flags: Does not provide a direct answer to 'how long does reviews take' (e.g., typical range in hours/days/weeks); Suggests looking at personal history as 'most reliable guide' without stating whether historical data correlates with future timelines; Personalized case reference ('your record', 'your history') functions as reassurance but does not address the general question asked. A rubric reading is not a verdict on truth; the rule is the reference.

2026-09-14 The rubric read this entry as "partly" against the rule: "A direct, correct answer to the question as asked, in plain language.". Directly addresses the question but declines to provide the specific answer (timeframe) the user asked for, offering context instead. Flags: Does not answer the specific question asked ('how long does it take'); instead explains why an answer cannot be given; Offers no estimate, range, or typical timeframe despite user asking for duration information; Introduces secondary topics (credential progress, incorrect review appeals) not requested in the question. A rubric reading is not a verdict on truth; the rule is the reference.